on 09-19-2014 4:35 PM
Dear all,
Rescheduling backorders with tcode V_V2,
Works great, except that I don't understand the following SAP rule:
Same if a Sales order is in rescheduling priority 1, quantity is not re-allocated if it doesn't cover the whole order quantity of the item:
Then it unconfirms the whole quantity of this order, and allocate it to the Sales order priority 2.
Example:
Material A,
stock: 15 PC
- First step: 2 sales-orders:
Order 1 (priority 1), ordered quantity = 20 PC --> 15 PC confirmed,
Order 2 (priority 2), ordered quantity = 4 PC. --> No quantity confirmed.
- 2nd step: good entry: 4 PC:
--> V_V2 result is:
Order 1: 15 PC --> 0 PC confirmed,
Order 2: 0 PC --> 4 PC confirmed.
Expected:
Order 1: 15 PC --> 19 PC
Order 2: 0 PC --> 0 PC
Could you please tell me why and how going through?
Kind regards,
Sebastien
Hi Sebastien,
It may be related to your setting in OVZJ. See SAP note 33084 for more details
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sebastien,
The note and customising are related to V_V2.
These settings have an effect on how V_V2 behaves.
I did a test on my internal example exactly as yours above.
--> V_V2 result is:
Order 1: 15 PC --> 0 PC confirmed,
Order 2: 0 PC --> 4 PC confirmed.
when OVZJ setting is " "
--> V_V2 result is:
Order 1: 15 PC --> 19 PC
Order 2: 0 PC --> 0 PC
when OVZJ setting is "E"
exactly as note 33084 explains.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.