cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Rescheduling Backorders: logic of not allocating quantity to an item if less than Order quantity

sundancer
Explorer
0 Kudos

Dear all,

Rescheduling backorders with tcode V_V2,

Works great, except that I don't understand the following SAP rule:

Same if a Sales order is in rescheduling priority 1, quantity is not re-allocated if it doesn't cover the whole order quantity of the item:

Then it unconfirms the whole quantity of this order, and allocate it to the Sales order priority 2.

Example:

Material A,

stock: 15 PC

- First step: 2 sales-orders:

Order 1 (priority 1), ordered quantity =  20 PC --> 15 PC confirmed,

Order 2 (priority 2), ordered quantity =  4 PC. --> No quantity confirmed.

- 2nd step: good entry: 4 PC:

--> V_V2 result is:

Order 1: 15 PC --> 0 PC confirmed,

Order 2: 0 PC --> 4 PC confirmed.

Expected:

Order 1: 15 PC --> 19 PC

Order 2: 0 PC --> 0 PC

Could you please tell me why and how going through?

Kind regards,

Sebastien

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member223981
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sebastien,

It may be related to your setting in OVZJ. See SAP note 33084 for more details

sundancer
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello Noel,

Thanks for your input, but OSS note and customizing point you inputed are related to the mechanism during keying the sales order.

But my issue is after that, when rescheduling backorder.

KR,

Sebastien

former_member223981
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sebastien,

The note and customising are related to V_V2.

These settings have an effect on how V_V2 behaves.

I did a test on my internal example exactly as yours above.

--> V_V2 result is:

Order 1: 15 PC --> 0 PC confirmed,

Order 2: 0 PC --> 4 PC confirmed.

when OVZJ setting is " "

--> V_V2 result is:

Order 1: 15 PC --> 19 PC

Order 2: 0 PC --> 0 PC

when OVZJ setting is "E"

exactly as note 33084 explains.

sundancer
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello Noel,

Please apology my too quick answer: your solution is working great!

Moreover, thanks for the time and patience you provided me with your second answer.

KR,

Sebastien

Answers (0)