cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Your content titled OB52 access for edit has been removed by SCN moderators. Please check your email inbox for more information.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Team,

I am getting this error when I am trying to put some discussion.

Your content titled OB52 access for edit has been removed by SCN moderators. Please check your email inbox for more information.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Jelena
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Before posting a question on SCN every member requires to do some troubleshooting themselves first and also search (Google and OSS notes) to make sure the same question has not been asked before.

I'm also not a moderator, but based on just the header I'm guessing either one of the two was not performed and that was the reason for removal. If you believe it's a security issue then by running security trace you'll find all the answers. Otherwise I'm guessing you wanted to edit OB52 in a non-modifiable system and then there is an OSS note on that.

SCN is not our private Help Desk, so kindly do some "due diligence" before posting new questions (and then posting yet another question on why they were removed). There is also this famous saying.

Thank you.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Jelena, thanks for the information  I will keep that in mind going forward , my question was little different, where user is having access for OB52 and he can edit as well, i want to  restrict that user for edit access in OB52

Former Member
0 Kudos

True, normally it is not working and the guru does not know why. Your question is special as it does work yet you dont know why.

Bottom line is that you must provide more information and have tried to analyze it yourself...


Raghav Raghav asked originally:

Hello Gurus,

I am facing issue when one user is accessing OB52 and he can edit it.Can you please help me to restrict this access.

That is not enough. But please analyze it and try again with more infos provided. 9 times out of 10 the user has some other role... (and we cannot see that...)

Cheers,

Julius

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Julius,

Thanks for your suggestion I will make sure that next time I follow the rules  . I have found the solution by the way, user was getting the access of edit because he was having  the access of S_TABU_DIS with activity 02 from some other role, that's why he was able to get 0b52 edit access.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I would have placed my bets on that...

Trick is to analyze it and provide information about your analysis before you ask the question.

Aditionally you should consider that buildig strong and blunt authoriations into the general user roles (common functions) for things like S_TABU* (or S_PROGRAM or S_DEVELOP or S_DATASET or S_RFC and many others) creates a "surfer" concept where the application authorizations are "surfing along" with such roles and the real roles cannot survive on their own without these "helpers". That is worst-case-scenario.

What you are supporting there is a mess  - which is not uncommon.

Cheers,

Julius

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for motivation .Yeah I am new to this account, will suggest to the mgmt for removing change activity and make it strong in critical auth obj.

Regards,

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yep. You quite likely inherited a problem.

It is quite popular to outsource error prone problems...

You must throw these problems back to the customer that they have a design problem... (I also read your other question threads).

Cheers,

Julius

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

Jelena
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

There are some blogs on how to post better questions: this one and this one. Also this blog would be helpful to those whose posts have been rejected.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yep, you should check your mails. It was classed as "issue dumping" and rejected.

It landed in the moderator alert queue twice. All you mention is that OB52 is working and you don't know why. You must explain what the problem is with enough information and what you have already tried to solve the problem, then people can discuss the merits of it.

The mail will also contain information for you about how to ask questions correctly on SCN.

Cheers,

Julius

Steffi_Warnecke
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Raghav,


well? Did you check your inbox for more information? You should also have gotten a notification in your "Actions"-box (right top corner here on SCN) for this.



Regards,

Steffi.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I have this problem, my email which is linked to SCN is no longer working for me.I am amazed why my post are getting deleted can you tell me why it is getting deleted

Steffi_Warnecke
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

No, I can not, because it can have several reasons (e.g. not following the Rules of Engagement, frequently ask question) and I don't know what you wrote in your thread.

Did you check the Action-box here on SCN? You should have a notification in there about the rejection of your content and most moderators include a text with the reason.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I checked but there was no reason , can you help how should I put my query ,I have put my earlier query in the following words.

OB52 access for edit.

One of my user facing issue , when he tries to access OB52 he is able to edit .How can I restrict that OB52 edit access.

Regards,

Steffi_Warnecke
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

I can't help you with that, sorry. That's not my area, so I don't know if that may be a basic question that you could easily answer yourself by searching for it (another reason for a rejection BTW).

In what space did you create your thread? We can ping the space moderators, so they can answer your question better.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for your help, it was SAP security space

Steffi_Warnecke
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Okay, the -space. So let's inform for starters.

BTW: You can find the moderators of a space on the Overview-page of each space and by just copying the link of their profiles into your post (it's called "mention"), they get a notification for the thread (just if you need that in future ).