cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

/416 WT

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All

Iam stuck with an issue

Scenario 1

/416 WT  amount is wrongly calculated... If the /101 amount is 13050, no /416 reflects 143550 wherein it should be 156600 ( difference of Rs.13050)

Scenario 2

/4MI, /4MH is getting generated..how do i avoid the same in RT

Your response for the above will be a great help and right answer / helpful answers will be rewarded

BR

Anil

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Can anybody help on the issue please?

Anil

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

For your 1st scenario,

Check the Output result of INTAX function. /124 and /125 wage type amounts are moved to /410 and /411. Then /416 is total of /410 and /411.Check the projection factor and for which month onwards he is getting the salary. I think so he is getting from May or any of the month he was full LWP.

For Scenario 2nd Scenario,

After INTAX function you insert a pcr and by which make /4MI & /4MH zero.

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks Sankarsan. The projection factor is an issue out here, where it reflects 10, rather i should be 11, please let me know how the same can be corrected

Please note T54C0  is maintained correctly

Anil

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Anil,

Employee date of joining ?

Former Member
0 Kudos

01 Jan 2014

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Anil,

Check wrongly user has run the separation process on next year Feb 2015.

or any custom PCR has been inserted after INN0 pcr or check DATES function output in INN1 subschema from there you will get to know all dates.

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sankarsan

Separation action is not run

Anil

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All

Please note that the issue is with projection WT (/401) which is trigeering as 10 ( infact should be 11) which will fix the issue

I tried with a  pcr to eliminate the /4MI and /4MH, but failed even tried with operation SUBWT

Request your help on this asap as its business critical

Anil

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Anil,

Please recheck once the payroll generation periods.

RPUCTP00

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sankar

Payroll Periods and cumulation calendar is generated properly

Anil

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sankar

Period Parameters and Cumulation Calendar is up to date

Anil

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

Write the below PCR.

ZTST

*

****

     ADDWT *

/4MI

     ZERO= A

/4MH

     ZERO= A

Check.

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

check the Pcr for INN0 - setup for projection factor.

pcr will check the payroll parameters SPRJF check this in V_T511P

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Your period parameter might be correct but check table V_T549Q.


Here payroll period has been generated correctly based on start date and end date of the month.


Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Praneeth,

Thanks!!.. Even this doesnt fix it up

Anil

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sankar

V_T549Q is generated properly

Former Member
0 Kudos

No Sankar, even this PCR doesnt works out

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos


Hi Anil,

It's working. I have tested.

Check the attached PCR.

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Sankar,

Finally This worked out with SUBWTE ops... Thanks a lot for your help. But am still stuck with projection factor /101 ( Scenario 1)

Cheers!!

Anil

Sanky
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Anil,

Regenerate Payroll period once again and check.

Regards,

Sankarsan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Tried that Sankar!!..didnt get through

Anil