Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

BPC 10 NW - Eliminations and Adjustments Rule for IC Elimination - unexpected result

Dear BPC Experts,


I am testing IC (Intercompany) Elimination rule. I cannot understand the results I am getting.

I have the following set of IC data in model - see below:


I have set up elimination rules as in the attached files.


I expect the whole value 328.620.898 would be eliminated (posted on ELIM10 AuditTrail) once consolidation logic is executed whereas only part of it (272.493.032) is actually eliminated. I do not understand where the number 272.493.032 is coming from.

I also expect the whole value 489.912.353 to be eliminated whereas only 2.510.329 gets eliminiated.

Do I do something wrong?

Thank You!

Marek

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

1 Answer

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Jun 04, 2014 at 06:16 PM

    Dear Experts,

    I found the root cause of the problem:

    Generic Scope Variation FLOW member (FLOWTYPE = "VARSCP") has been wrongly customized in the system.

    Marek

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.