cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using concat Function in Mapping

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

I have a mapping where I'm using the standart concat function to concatenate the content of two queues. Every queue has normally only one entry. When both queues have one entry, it is working without any issues.

But now my problem: First queue has one entry and second queue has only a supresser. When I want to concatenate both queues, the result is also a supresser. But I'd like to have that the result will be the entry of the first queue when second queue exists of supresser...

How can I get this realized that the concat function is also working in this case? 

Is there maybe a workaround?

Thank you for your help.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi ,

Use map with default before second field which is having suppress value .Check the snapshot for reference

Thanks.

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

former_member190681
Active Participant
0 Kudos

This message was moderated.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Lukas

You can add the node function MapwithDefault with default value space after the field which is having suppress value.

Then add the output of MapwithDefault to the second input of concat function.

This will generate the output as the value of first field.

let me know if you have any doubts.