on 04-25-2014 5:49 PM
I'm currently trying to bring UCES online for a client.
I'm having issues with modifying UCES using NWDI/NWDS.
The environment is setup like this:
UCES on its own box with Netweaver 7.00 SP30
NWDI on its own box with Netweaver 7.4
NWDS 7.00 running with Oracle JDK 1.4.2_19
The track is set up as a "modification" track with SAPUCES and FSCM_BD:
I have imported all the dependent SCs except UMEADMIN since it doesn't appear on the "Check-in" tab.
Then I go to NWDS, download the config and try to "Sync Sources..." and get these errors:
Not sure if this is UCES specific error or because of something not setup correctly with NWDI?
Or maybe I didn't follow the correct steps?
Thanks!
Eddy
OMG!
I created an OSS incident with SAP and they ended up re-assembling the SCA so now in the SMP there's a new version (update 1, I think).
Well, thanks for your answers, anyway!
Eddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Eddy,
Sorry for posting here,But I found very few people expert in areas of UCES...
We are facing issue in customizing UCES.Here is the list of issue I am facing
while customizing UCES.
Here is the thread
Regards
Imran Khan
Thanks to both Jun and Stefan!
I have verified that the file NOT corrupt since I can unzip it with JAR.
I have also looked into the SP_MANIFEST.MF file. In it, the entry for approvalstatus is:
pr_approvalstatus: EXTERNAL
So what does it mean to have a value of "EXTERNAL" (since this file comes from SAP)?
How can I have a value of "ASSEMBLED"?
Thanks!
Eddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Eddy,
Did you add 7.00 UMEADMIN SC to the CMS inbox?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, the file UMEADMIN30_0-10003471.SCA is physically on the file system in the inbox directory together with the other SCA files.
I have read somewhere that it would only appear in the "check in" tab if there's a build-time dependency.
Since it's a "modification" track, all dependencies are pre-setup by SAP. How might I check to see that there is indeed a build-time dependency or not?
Thanks!
Eddy
first check the sld to see if the dependency is defined or not. i think it should be there if it is required for this SC. update the cms content.
when you add SC to the track, it automatically pull all the dependency, after that you can add your own dependency if you are sure it(umeadmin) is required,
As you can see in my original post, in the 1st image, UMEADMIN is already a dependency of FSCM_BD. This was automatically pulled in when I added FSCM_BD. I didn't add it.
So the question is why is it not appearing in the check in list?
Is there a way to find out what kind of dependency it is (build-time, runtime, etc.)?
Thanks!
Eddy
check if this helps
The behaviour (and the potential causes) is described in SAP note:
#1259604 - CMS check-in tab: Not all files from inbox are displayed
This implies that an SCA downloaded from e.g. a development system (i.e. not assembly step) will NOT be visible in the Inbox. Technically this can be checked by looking at the SAP_MANIFEST.MF of the SCA. The "pr_approvalstatus" must be "ASSEMBLED".
Actually there are two filters when you check in a file:
the first is the track configuration itself. The files in the CMS/inbox will be shown on the check in tab if they were really conigured on the track data tab in the landscape configurator. The second filter is the SAP_MANIFEST.MF file inside the SCA. If it has not the proper structure then it won't be possible to check in. This file guarantees that an SCA file is allowed for check in.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.