cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

0 Kudos


Hi,

Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.

Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.

Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.

What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g.  based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced  in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need  in 1 day , but it  can not be produced in 1 day   ).

what did I miss?

Thanks a lot for any information!

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Caetano
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hello Simona

The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.

However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.

Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:


You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:

  • Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
  • Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.

Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.

BR

Caetano

0 Kudos

Hi Caetano,

Thanks for your answer.

I calculated processing time based on routing with CA02, then I updated material master with CA96.

Now in house porduction time is 0 day (not 1 day as before), but instead work scheduling is updated(with processing time and base quantity ).

So the in- house production time is removed.

Regards,

Simona