GRN issue against PO

[Former Member]

Hi,

We are facing an issue while doing the GRN(goods receipt note) against PO as "NO Data available Message no WRF_CONS010".

And for same case when we are trying to do the inward in other client, we are able to do inwarding.

Kindly suggest what to do!!

Thanks & Regards

Ritesh Kumar

[Former Member]

Cecil D'Souza and Jürgen L

You guys are the two of the seniors member of the SCN group.

And if you guys are talking like this so where do we fresher go!!

And If we know each and every thing then why do we come to this group!!

Before posting any issue What do you suggest, do we have to drop a message to your mail box to request you to check and correct the same????

Support activity is the important part for a company.

If system is behaving like this only what should we do!

We are facing issue as

     1 delivery having 2 or 3 PGI

     Invoice is getting saved(Accounting Document is posted)   and when we check the same invoice no in VF02 we are not getting that no whether we get the accounting entry for the same.

Jürgen L

You have elebrated my posted line as phrase.

have you tried to understand the meaning of this post?

"NO"

Client means different different system like Development(SRD), Testing(SRT), Production(SRP) in ECC6.

If I am unable to same case in SRD and SRT system, So I have posted that

You guys gave a full page lecture on the topic.

These type of posts are written by you guys, we can't accept.

Thanks & Regards

Ritesh Kumar

[JL23]

Every fresher is welcome, no doubt.

But you have to understand that SCN is not meant as a replacement for class room training.

And SCN is not your free of charge 1st level support either.

It is part of the forum rules that anybody has to search for an answer before posting a question

It was discussed several hundred times in SDN and SCN that it is important to search before posting. And this is activity which can even be achieved by newbies.

Read the Moderator spotlight blogs, read the Member of the Month blogs, almost all are expressing the same thoughts and said that they watched for many months before they posted the first time.

The part you made bold is just not understandable, try to read this question as if you see it the first time, do you really think that anybody is able to know what is meant. Except that everybody who has a basic training can know that VF02 is not a transaction to display accounting documents. Instead of putting everything into one sentence you should try to explain more clearer what you did and what you expect and what your question is.

Read this wonderful post, it explains it what is expected from everybody before posting:

If someone still has doubts, here a few links where this was all discussed before:

[JL23]

What shall the basis team do? are they the collection container for unresolved application questions?

What shall the ABAPers do? analyze the program code to identify what is wrong in  the business process?

does really someone believe to get to a solution with such a weak defined question.

the positive thing is that the error message was posted, so it could be used to search for OSS notes, just in case there is a known bug or a gap in consulting knowledge.

But this phrase is nothing else than confusing "for same case when we are trying to do the inward in other client, we are able to do inwarding."

This sounds like I come home in the evening and my key does not fit, okay I go to my neighbors house and was able to get in.

And how about this: " message comes as warning.  But while saving, Facing the same issue."

What is it now? a warning or an error?

Wouldn't it be logical to analyze the general  process  first. Had it worked yesterday? is it something new what you try, something what was never done in your system before even it is already live for many years?

What is the process, is it just a receipt to a standard purchase order, or  is it eventually stock transport order process, or maybe consignment process, or a returns order, eventually inbound delivery processing involved too?

We do not know anything yet, but okay like in the company, closing the ticket, making the desk clean,  forward it to another team, and the client is happy.

[Former Member]

lets maintain some sweets talks guys. no blam games please

[JL23]

What I see here every day:

- poor questions without any effort taken to search for solutions.

- no single effort taken to even write a subject line free of mistakes, not talking about the content

- not answering to given proposals, not even mentioning if they tried anything from the proposals

- posting answers without even reading the questions

- posting even wrong solutions. Why are you posting solutions that you are not sure about yourself?

Any of this makes SCN a little bit more unattractive.

Please, it is not just the moderators work to keep this place a bit cleaner.

Dont answer those basic questions where the user had not taken any effort in the search and in quality of this question. Click Alert Moderator instead. This helps. The posters who do not take any effort will learn quickly to search first  Or You learn quickly .... if you see that all your efforts taken to spoon feed  have been useless when the content is removed before points can be given, or  the points get removed after.

Answering such questions does not help the posters and not SCN, it is contra-productive, they even search less when they see  that their question is answered in 2 minutes and post even more basic questions.

And nobody has time to think about more complex questions, "why should one think for 5 minutes if he could make 10 points in a second by answering a question which has been answered a 100 times before"?

[cecil_dsouza]

You are spot on Jurgen in your explanation. A lot of people seem to write one liners as questions and there are even more people willing to answer that by asking more questions. By the time the solution is rendered, there is a huge long trail on unwanted rubbish - 'Try this and try that'. Granted that there are numerous people genuinely interested in helping out. But in doing so, discipline should be maintained or one will be messing around wasting time for nothing especially when the answer may already exist.

When a poster posts a question without taking any effort to clearly articulate or define what the issue or problem is, it should never be answered. If the issue is an error with no clear error message AND no message number provided, the post should be ignored. The 'Alert moderator is the best choice'. Just because a service is provided by dedicated professionals for free, that should not make it a forum where the process is misused.

[former_member183424]

The most commonly things happens in MM forum is "Basic Question"

I press "Alert Moderator" 3-4 time daily just for the basic question..

If one option can be done in SCN, then I hope it can be stopped..

Suppose someone create a thread and give the thread's subject as "XXXXXX".

After press "Post Message", the next screen will be goes to search for the subject "XXXXXXX"..

In that way user can see the old discussion for the particular subject..

Then if any discussion will not solve his query, then he will post the message..

Most of new people comes here for the solution for their query, but what they do?

They just come to MM forum and press "Start a discussion" without searching anythings..

Ever some user don't know the search procedure, they just come for the solution.

[Former Member]

Hi Dëv Päträ

your idea has been posted in Idea place:

Posting similar questions which has been answered already in forum

[Former Member]

hi Ritesh,

Please ask your ABAPer to check this one. Seems some inconsistency with some data structure.

Regards,

Vivek Singh

SAP MM and GTS consultant

[Prasoon]

Hi,

   Could you please try the same in MIGO instead of MB01. If its throwing the same message, please share in which release you are in.

Regards,

AKPT

[Former Member]

Hi,

We are also facing the same issue in MIGO but there the message comes as warning.

But while saving, Facing the same issue.

We are using ECC 6 EHP6 version.

Thanks & Regards

Ritesh Kumar

[Former Member]

If you have activated retail consignment process, Please check following notes which provides the correction information

1973448 - MIM: Goods Receipt for an Open Stock Transfer Purchase Order with Returns Cannot be Posted...

1077786 - MIGO: Errors from WRF_CONS not processed in SAP Retail

[Former Member]

can you try once for other po's. is it saying the same thing for that as well?

[Former Member]

We are facing the same issue approx our 26 Store site codes.

[Former Member]

Take help from Basis team for resolving the issue.

There might be inconsistency in the database.