cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

IndVal of wage type 1019: No entry in table T510 for key 'IQ01013GRADE 1301 ' on 26.02.2014

Former Member
0 Kudos


Dear All,

Message no. RP032

While maintaining 1019 wage type in IT0008 for an employee, I get the error message "IndVal of wage type 1019: No entry in table T510 for key 'IQ01013GRADE 1301 ' on 26.02.2014". It does not allow me to save the record.

Below was the R&D done.

1. Checked the entries in T510 and the entries with employee sub grouping for CAP is present there with both 1 and 3 .

2. Checked the validity dates of the entry and the date record is being created. Both are in sync.

3. Checked in table t511 table and see TARIF with type A has been maintained and entries looks fine.

This is International payroll.

Pls feel free to let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks in advance

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Can you paste the screen shot from tables V_T510, V_T511 and V_511_B for that WT.

regards,

Narendra

Former Member
0 Kudos

table t510

MANDT MOLGA TRFAR TRFGB TRFKZ TRFGR    TRFST LGART  ENDDA      BEGDA      BETRG

100   IQ    01    01    1     GRADE 13 1            31.12.9999 01.01.2012              0.00
100   IQ    01    01    3     GRADE 13 1            31.12.9999 01.01.2012              0.00

t511
MANDT    100
MOLGA    IQ
LGART    1019
ENDDA    31.12.9999

BEGDA    01.01.1992
ABTYZ       1
WKTYZ     11
OPKEN
ZEINH    030
KOMBI    2
BTMIN    0
BTMAX    0
ADSUM    X
MODNA    TARIF
MODSP
RUTYP
RUDIV    0
ADDJN
MOD01    1
MOD02
MOD03    A
ANMIN    0.00
ANMAX    0.00

V_511_B

Wage Type       1019 Bonus Percentage                  01.01.1992 31.12.9999

EE Subgroup grouping   Personal subarea

0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
          1                          1  1

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

It looks like the entry in field TRFST is the culprit. You have '1' but the system is looking for '01' which doesn't exist.

Regards

Dave

former_member198473
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Dave,

TRFST would not be the issue as system allows to save all other wage types and the user is facing issue only on this particular wage type 1019. Also the error message would have been different and it would have been worded as  " No entry in table T510 for key 'IQ01013GRADE 1301 ' on 26.02.2014".

Thanks

Shine

Former Member
0 Kudos

Is there an entry at all in t510 where lgart = 1019? TARIF is being used for indirect evaluation, but the message indicates that there is no corresponding entry for the wage type in T510.

Regards

Dave

Former Member
0 Kudos

in t510 there is no entry specific to any wage type. Pasted above entries specific to our case. 

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Can you check the dates and also ESG groupings once

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Sikindar,

Thanks for your message.

Actually read your comments for other notes on same issue and did the check on the validity dates and employee grouping first and included the same while raising the issue.

Those look fine.


sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You are getting issue in the wage type 1301 , Check the ESG grouping for the wage type one it should be 3 Can you paste the screen shot of the same

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sikindar,

Wage type 1301? If you dont mind, could you pls let me explain the same.

Also in table t510 I dont have any entry specific to wage types. Have pasted then entries above where there are entries with ESG for CAP with 3

Its a client system and hence not sharing direct screen shots but instead data points.

Thanks for all your tiime..

Former Member
0 Kudos

Screenshot of table t510 with entry 3

MANDT MOLGA TRFAR TRFGB TRFKZ TRFGR    TRFST LGART  ENDDA      BEGDA      BETRG

100   IQ    01    01    1     GRADE 13 1            31.12.9999 01.01.2012              0.00
100   IQ    01    01    3     GRADE 13 1            31.12.9999 01.01.2012              0.00

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Table T510 will have pay scale structure which includes PCR Grouping , PS group , Level , wage type , Start date , End date , amount in your case Wage type 1301 is missing can u check that one

user is giving the wage type directly ... in IT0008 without checking the PST and PSA from the drop down list hence u are getting this issue

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sikindar,

I tried selecting from the PST and PSA drop downs, still the error appears.

Former Member
0 Kudos

international payroll but the error message is saying:

IQ01013GRADE 1301 :

     IQ                         MOLGA

     01                        TRFAR     

     01                        TRFGB

     3                          TRFKZ

     GRADE 13          TRFGR

     01                         TRFST


molga IQ is for Iraq...  which molga is used in T510 table (easy display via SE16N)? Also can you find an entry matching all these parameters?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks Bruno for your message.

Yes it is for Iraq country and table t510 has entries for Iraq itself.

Former Member
0 Kudos

as indicated by you that entries do exist in T510, correct groupings in V_503_ALL and the characteristics of the wage type is correct in T511. I would place break-point at following place:

MP000840 - Form routine CHECK_T510: at line 195 where the selected statement is done on the table T510. Here check which values extactly are searched on table T510.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks Bruno.

I shall apply your approach and update back.

Thanks

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Reema,

were you able to debug the selection on table T510S? As I see you're still struggling with this topic.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Bruno,

While debugging, control does not perform the check on table T510 itself and instead goes to T710.

Code  appears like the below

CASE P0008-CPIND.

    WHEN SPACE OR 'T' OR 'D'.

      PERFORM CHECK_T510.

    WHEN 'S'.

      PERFORM CHECK_T710.

    WHEN OTHERS.

Here our value for CPIND is S and hence goes to T710. In Non Production system the value for CPIND is T and hence goes to T510. in Quality we face no issues but only in the production. Is this variance causing the entire issue? Also how does the CPIND value (Planned compensation 1005) impacts the entire issue? I dont understand the link between the same. I read the documentation and understood the values for T and S and its meaning.