Unable to see the BP in GTS system with reference to the External BP

[Former Member]

Hi All,

i have created master record in ECC ,when i am trying to transfer the customer to GTS manually ,then pop up appears "Of 1 selected partner(s), 0 were processed successfully"

ECC detailed error message :

when i checked in GTS system the BP  is not available but the BP data is available in the table level "/SAPSLL/PNTBP"

Can you please through some lights on this...

Sravan

[former_member215181 · Accepted solution]

Hi Sravan,

There have been a couple of correction notes in this area recently.  Please search, and make sure that the relevant notes are applied in your system(s).

Otherwise; is this happening for ALL customers?  And how about vendors?

Regards,

Dave

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Dave,

Thanks for your quick reply,

The issue is only with one customer,rest of all customers are transferred successfully,

When i see the status of the BU using t.code /SAPSLL/PARTNER_APPL,where i can see the error

Business partner does not have GUID xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..........

Please help me on this

Cheers

Sravan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Dave,

i have tried to delete the inconsistent data using the t.code se38  and run the programme

(/SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP), then i saw that dependant data can be archieved in the table /sapsll/corpar,but when i see  in the table /sapsll/pntbp still the data is available,

note @ i have run this programme in the simulation mode,what needs to be done apart from this to get transferred the BP into the GTS System..

Sravan

[former_member215181 · Accepted solution]

Hi Sravan,

I'm sorry, but perhaps due to language difficulties, I (literally) don't understand either of your 2 previous postings.

All I have understood so far is that one of your transferred customers does not appear in GTS, even though you can see a relevant entry in table /SAPSLL/PNTBP.

Did you check the transfer log in GTS - if so, what information was given regarding the transfer?

And regarding the entry in table /SAPSLL/PNTBP, does it show an internal partner number?  If so, can you find a corresponding entry for that partner number in table BUT000?

Regards,

Dave

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Dave,

yes i have seen the internal partner number in table /SAPSLL/PNTBP, but i haven't seen the corresponding entry in the table BUT000

Thanks

Sravan

[former_member215181 · Accepted solution]

Hi Sravan,

Did you check the transfer log in GTS (System Monitoring > Logs > Business Partner)?  If so, what information was given regarding the transfer?

Regards,

Dave

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Dave ,

Thanks for your prompt reply,

My developer wrote one programme to detete the data in the table /sapsll/pntbp, now i am able to transfer again the customer master from feeder system,

if you want to see the programme please let me know,then i will post it

Now the issue is resolved.

Kind regards,

Siva Kandukuri.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Sravan,

May I ask why you didn't follow up on that SAP report (/SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP) which is a official solution given by SAP via KBA note 1824797.

I also face this issue with the incosistent business parter data. You may as well refer to my thread:

Regards,

Greg

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Greg,

I followed the process which is suggested in the note and executed the programme then i got the below message,

xxxxxxxxx      The entry has been deleted                        /SAPSLL/PNTBP

XXXXXXXXX      Archieve the listed the objects manually      /SAPSLL/CORPAR

But the correspondent data is appearing in the table /SAPSLL/PNTBP even after run the programme ,Then i try to retransfer the customer master from ECC ,then the same issue happened

"of (1) selected '0' processed successfully,

so i asked my developer to deleted this inconsistent data from table,for that he wrote a programme for this,now i am able to transfer the customer master from feeder system

Regards,

Sravan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Ok, I just asked because you mentioned earlier that you executed that report in simulation mode.

Of course there will be no change on database level if you just execute it in simulation mode but I guess you know that