Standard cost transfer via Split valuation

[ibrahim-gad]

Hello SAP experts,

I'm testing a new cycle of material split valuation via Mixed cost approach  based on production version and i want to check if this requirement is available or not

CK91N >>>  production version 1 linked to valuation type 1 & production version 2 linked to valuation type 2

CK94 >> I maintained Mixing ratio  for the plant 1 : 1

we run standard cost estimate in plant 1000 "mixed cost"

results are OK for valuation type 1 and 2

I want to transfer standard cost estimate to plant 1100 based on the same valuation types in 1000
so i maintained plant 1100 in CK91N  via process category stock transfer from plant 1000 and in material master I'v defined special procurement type stock transfer from 1000

but the results from costing run in plant 1100 came from the average cost estimate of plant 1000 regardless valuation type

i want to transfer standard cost from plant 1000 valuation type 1 to plant 1100 valuation type 1 not the average of the header material

can i customize different process category "stock transfer" that contains plant and valuation type
or can i do this via special procurement type customization or BAdI 

any suggestion would be helpful

Many Thanks

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi..

We use split valuation and material ledger.

We have same business scenario like your.

Costing view have average STD cost but accounting view for valuation type have each STD cost.

So,  when we transfer material from plant 1000 valuation type 1 to plant 1100, plant 1000 valuation type 1’s STD is used for valuation. When we transfer material from plant 1000 valuation type 2 to plant 1100, plant 1000 valuation type 2’s STD is used for valuation. 

Each the valuation type’s std is used for valuation at the valuation type level. FI document is occurred using the valuation type’s std . So, we have no issue.

[ibrahim-gad · Accepted solution]

thanks Big Choi for your reply,

I've checked all steps

i was using CK91N to maintain plant 1100 so, when doing Std for the plant it drives average cost for plant 1000

I'v removed the related settings for this

now the issue turned to something else

to drive the cost I've maintained Special procurement type for transfer std from plan 1000

..... but std released without updating std field in master data for v.type 1 & 2 only shows in header material

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi..

To release each std cost to accounting view for each valuation type, you should maintain procurement alternative and mixing ratios.

You should create procurement alternative for receiving plant’s material using valuation type  1
& 2 and process category “stock transfer” and input mixing ratios.

If you don’t see each std in accounting view for v.type 1 & 2, you delete current std cost using t-code ckr1 and create procurement alternative and mixing ratios and calculate and mark and release std cost again.

[ibrahim-gad · Accepted solution]

that what i was doing at first

to make the case clear

in supplying plant 1000/ matrial FRT 300 with valuation category "X"

1- I've maintained special procurement alternative  via CK91N

     a) v.type 1 >>> for production version 1

     b) v. type 2 >>> for production version 2

2- mixed ration maintained for plant 1000 1 : 1 for both v.type

3- released std  based on valuation type

     a) v.type 1 >> 26 $

     b) v.type 2 >> 23 $

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

to transfer std to plan 1100

1- special procurement alternative  via CK91N has been maintained

     a) v.type 1 >>>> process category stock transfer special procurement plant 1000

     b) v.type 2 >>>> process category stock transfer special procurement plant 1000

2- Mixed ratio maintained  for plant 1100 1 : 1 for both v.type

now during CK11N or CK40N

price update as average 24.5 $ for both v. types with is the main issue

do i have to change something in material master or in the above process  

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi..

The cause is that the screen for creating procurement alternative don’t have valuation type field for sending material.

But, if you use material ledger, you can solve your issue through material ledger closing.

Refer to below FI document.

1) v,type 1 in plant 1000 -> v.type 1 in plant 1100

    DR) Stock for v.type1 in plant 1100 24.5      CR) Stock for v,type 1 in plant 1000 26

            Transfer difference for v.type1 in plant 1100 1.5

2) v,type 2 in plant 1000 -> v.type 2 in plant 1100

    DR) Stock for v.type2 in plant 1100 24.5 CR) Stockfor  v,type 2 in plant 1000 23

                                                               Transfer difference for v.type2 in plant 1100  1.5

  3) Material ledger closing for v.type1.

     DR) Stock for v.type1 in plant 1100 1.5       CR) Difference clearing for v.type1 in plant 1100  1.5

  4) Material ledger closing for v.type2

    DR) transfer difference for v.type2 in plant 1100  1.5  CR) Stock for v.type2 in plant 1100 1.5

Finally, Stock for v.type 1 in plant 1100 become 26.

            Stock for v.type 2 in plant 1100  become 23.

[ibrahim-gad · Accepted solution]

when choosing in procurement alternative only the plant witch make sense to drive std from that plant on header material

in this case

we determine V.type 1 for receiver plant 1100 , via stock transfer >> it will drive the average cost of header material of sender plant 1000

and regarding to material ledger solution, it is not possible at this moment to proceed in such solution as business requirement

now, what I'm thinking about is look for some work around to drive cost from V.type to another from cross plants

[ibrahim-gad]

any news guys