on 12-19-2013 10:40 AM
Hi,
I have a situation where records are not loading from underlying layer.
I load DSO 1 from DSO 2 and DSO 3.
DSO2--> Order data
DSO3-->delivery data
Delivery qty is mapper from delivery dso only.
DSO 1 has key--> Ordet item
One sales document in DSO 3 has delivery qty as 10 CS(say).
On loading DSO is picking 0 CS.
When i check change log of DSO 1 i find a very strange scenario.
A record with R recordmode is generated which negates the delivery qty value in DSO 1 and showing as zero.
For the same document delivery qty value is avaliable id DSO 3 (underlying DSo).
Checks:
In DSO 2 and 3 no deletion happened for the document and delivery qty is present.
In ECC the corresponding item was never deleted( Item 10 has issues).
Attaching the screnshot for change log of DSO 1.
Item 10 higlighted in green and the records are arranged in descending order of their loading and record number as well.
My question is if there is no deletion either in ECC and BW ,from where did the record with R image appear in DSO 1 and caused the issue,
Thanks
Nayab
Still facing...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Nayab,
I think I understood the problem, but as like you I am also unable to trace the root cause. But as an observation from the data screen shot, the records which are in discussion, I see that there are no values for company code and sales organization. I understand that if we want to really delete the records we don't need the values of data fields, but as per your analysis the 0recordmode is automatically generated with out your knowledge, if this is so, then other values should exist and this 0recordmode might some how generated with R.
If we are in sync so far then, if we see why the values are not generated in other fields, by debugging, I guess we might at least know the path of the cause.
This is just a blind guess, I might be totally wrong, but still with this explanation, if some one gets some different idea and that clicks, we all will be happy right.
Thanks,
-Mike.
Hi Mike,
Thanks for highlighting the point and below is my observation
1) Data fields company code and sales org are only mapped from order dso
2) Record with R recordmode is generated from delivery side .
So for the record with R recordmode the data fields are blank because they arent mapped to delivery DSO.
Another thing that you can see from screenshot for item 10 delivery data is loaded prior to order data.
This is unusual behaviour , in correct scenarios order record will loaded before delivery record.
Anyways, i am still not able to figure from where did R recordmode showed up?
Thanks
Nayab
Hi,
pls check reord no 1259 for item 10.
record 1262 is R recormode.
Thanks
Nayab
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Nayub,
Change your DSO 1 modelling by adding one characteristic , which distinguish record is belongs to order or delivery.
As if both order and delivery holding same document number, record are getting overwrite.
I suggest you add 0VTYPE in key fields of DSO1 and write transformation (field level routine) -
DSO2--> Order data records as - 10
DSO3-->delivery data records as - 20
Now, records get segregate according to Order and delivery status and avoids overwriting same key records.
Best wishes, Vijay
Hi Vijay,
I dont need to remodel.
Different fiels are coming from DSO 2 and DSO3 to DSO 1.
Delivery quantity is coming only from delivery DSO.
So if my DSO 1 has 10 fields, i am updating 5 each from DSO 2 and DSO 3 to create one record in DSO 1. So no need to add another key and remodel
Thanks
Nayab
Hi Nayab,
Just check one thing after loading from DSO3 to DSO1 check the data in actiation queue. This quantity is available or not in activate table. I just want to check this quantity is getting nagated at the time of loading or at the time of activations.And try to load that particular delivery only..
Thanks,
Kamal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.