Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Inspection Plan Migration strategy/methods

I have been through multiple iterations of loading inspection plans via the standard LSMW objects and I am still looking for an effective way to load inspection plans that have common inspection characteristics but different specifications and/or control indicators.

I have tried loading plan-specific specifications using preset indicators and updating the specifications directly in the creation load. This still causes the batch input to require running in display errors mode because when the indicators differ from the master inspection characteristics, SAP calls screens that have different field combinations than the batch input.

I have also tried loading all inspection plans with the same indicators, then doing recordings of QP02 for updating control indicators and specifications. This requires extracting data from PLMK so ensure that the correct records are selected in the recording, and multiple recordings to allow for the different screens that are called after changing indicators (for example, allowing for a screen with only an upper limit field then another recording allowing for a screen with an upper and lower limit). I don't consider this method stable at all. There are too many recording and too much manual data manipulation.

Does anyone have a good method for loading inspection plans with common characteristics but plan-specific specifications?

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

2 Answers

  • Posted on Dec 11, 2013 at 04:28 AM

    Hi Nick,

    Im not sure if I could follow you correctly. But did you try loading the task list using CWBQM?


    Using this Tcode, you can load all the inspection plans for a specific MIC.

    ntn

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Dec 11, 2013 at 10:59 AM

    Hi, I have used SAP standard BI method to load quite complex plans (in data migration - load perspective) which comprised of header details with Long Text (LT) & Material & Vendor assignament, operations with LT, MIC (Standard & Local with Qualitative / Quantitive) with LT.

    It works fine and I have NOT faced any problems as such.

    Hope it helps.

    Best Regards, Murugesh

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.