on 11-28-2013 1:04 PM
Hi,
Yet another issue and new for me.
I have a Qty Contract.
The release orders 1, 2, 3
1 is O.K
2 is charging the customer less because I can see the problem in Pricing.
3 is O.K
now upon analysing I found in the item conditions the the condition types are doubeling up as can be seen in the screen shot.
Any idea why is happening and how to resolve this?
Thanks,
Sridhar.
I just studied the thread on this type of errors of "Condition type doubling in sales order""??
Why every body is asking to check the exclusive indicator in Access sequence???
As far as I know the exclusive indicator--stop the system-- in further searching of condition records-if active...Increase the system performance as Suggested By Mr Glync..
Suppose if i maintain Exclusive indicator for my PR00( PR02-Acc Seq) and i maintained all the three combination some records--Now--
Scenario-1: Activate exclusive--then system will take from the condition record mainatained in first step.
Scenario-2: Deactive--Then system will search for the condition records for all the conditions and accordingly to step-- paste the record back to SO--
Why to Check Exclusive indicator here--am i missing any thing--pl describe with example if any...
Phanikumar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Phani,
I agree with you that this most likely is not the issue cropping out of to "Exclusive Indicator".
Further, as Sridhar has pointed out " I see the anomaly is doubling of condition types and so the double discount in one way. If there was any issue in access sequence, or condition records, 1 and 3 had the similar problem."
I agree with Sridhar on the above point. I had suggested to him to see the Billing and Account Document to check if they are doubled there.
I strongly feel that they[accounting entries] are not and as long as that happens [no doubling in accounting] from this particular transaction accounting point of view we are fine.
That being said, I see that there is a difference of amount between the Sales Order and Billing for all the three contract Line Items which is another issue we might want to see, but that could be totaling of the values issue and not postings issue.
Sridhar:
If you are inclined, you could do the following in a sequence as a process of elimination :
i) Actual Pricing Procedure Config;
ii) Full Screen of the Pricing Analysis - right now you dont have the total value component
I had a similar issue long time back on Taxes only, but unfortunately for us, I am not able to remember the fix.
Hope I am not adding to the confusion .
Thanks.
Hi All,
Thanks for the active participation, and this is yet another unresolved case.
I have contacted SAP Labs and the reply is in inset.
We ourselves could not replicate this either in DEV or QAS.
I would say I would close this thread here in SCN but it is still active at my work place and will update if I will ever get the resolution.
Kind Regards,
Sridhar.
Hi,
I can see some strange things in your screen shot.Actually,if there are more than one same condition type in condition tab then they would be in red mark or inactive mode but in your case I can see ZBDP and ZCNP two are in red mark as well as ZCSC, ZHAU , ZTLD and ZSCO are in active mode in double.
I think,ZBDP and ZCNP are not fulfilled their requirement in sales order that's why some one might be entered manually ZBDP and ZCNP to get these.
Now coming to the ZCSC,ZHAU,ZTLD and ZSCO condition types might be came by two different tables because your sales order fields might be matched with two condition tables records. If marked exclusive in access sequence for these tables then you don't get this kind of problems
See analysis of this in condition tab.
Thanks,
Naren
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Lakshmipathi,
Thanks for the Link and checked the exclusive indicator, and yes it is O.K
Now as I said in my question, the release orders 1 and 3 are O.K . Only for the second one i.e. no: 2, and if there was any problem in config, no:1 and 3 would not be right.
when you see first relase order where 6720/15 = 448
yellow highlighted one 6450/15 = 430
the next one is again 6720/15 = 448
and the Q.contract was also made with the value 448 euros for the 50 qty's.
so in case of 2nd release order system is charging on 430 euros.
when I checked the item condition, I see the anomoly is doubling of condition types and so the double discount in one way .
If there was any issue in access sequence, or condition records, 1 and 3 had the similar problem.
Thanks,
Sridhar.
It would very helpful if you can update here if your issue is resolved so that it will be helpful to other members who face similar issue.
G. Lakshmipathi
User | Count |
---|---|
110 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.