RM06EW47 vs RM06EW70

[Former Member]

I tried to archive(write) a PO in Test mode by RM06EW47(se38)  and RM06EW70(sara) and obtain the follow result.

It looks strange. Should an OSS be opended for this?

RM06EW70(sara) (residence time check  creation date is ticked)

RM06EW47(se38)

[JL23 · Accepted solution]

Before you started archiving, did you do the most important step?  This most important step is for me applying all archiving object related OSS notes.

it could for example be an authorization issue, have you checked the joblog, it is eventually given information about that.

there is a program bug with the authorization for the new write program, see 1674444 - MM_EKKO: Incorrect authorization check for activity 06

[Former Member]

This link may help...

http://scn.sap.com/community/information-lifecycle-management/blog/2012/09/24/sap-data-archiving-cha...

[Former Member]

Hi Anthony,

I remember, the similar problem happend in my project as well.

Please go through all the notes related to MM_EKKO. We have implemented 3-4 related notes.

Program RM*****70 is the one with some updates I guess.

Thanks & BR,

Yogesh.

[Former Member]

Can u pls post input screen also.

[Former Member]

as requested

RM06EW47(SE38)

RM06EW70(SE38)

RM06EW70(SARA)

[Former Member]

I've checked and both the reports works on the same logic for archive the PO's (except few additional criteria). Not sure why this strange behavior in your system is happening.

May be you can cross check with the purchase document number in both the reports, i mean have you given the same purchase document number..?