QA32/QA33 - AFS fields S_SIZE and S_SCAT on selection screen.

[Former Member]

Hi Experts.

Please I'm in an SAP upgrading release 5.0 to 6.0.

But in 6.0 release the transactions above are displaying two new AFS fields S_SIZE/S_SCAT on selection screen with tecnical names (PS print-screen), what could I do to solve this issue? There's one note?

I'm thinking to ask my basis a access key and then go to SE38 - "Selection Text" and mark "Dictionary Ref." to these fields.

I'm glad for any reply .

Thanks

[Former Member]

Sorry,

I've forgotten to insert screen,

Regards

[Sijin_Chandran]

Hello Vinicius ,

The part of Selection Screen block you are referring to is Customized one I guess , reason being I can't find it in my system.

But I am also confused , how this Custom Screen Block has been coded reason being QA32/33 uses Logical DB PGQ and this screen of QA32 is indeed the Selection Screen of PGQ .

So how can this be possible , if really any customization has been carried out

[Former Member]

Hello Sijin,

First, thank you for your reply,

I tried to access QA32/QA32 on another systems, but no one of them has AFS module.

These fields are intended to AFS, unfortunately too few company has such AFS module, then we can't compare.

Ralease 5.0 these fields doesn't exist.

Another important thing is that QE51N transaction has the same issue. Now are three transaction with such issue.

Please, have you seen this before?

Regards and thanks.

[Former Member]

Problem solved.

Below the solution just for future reference.

There's some enhancement-points within these transaction, then I created an implementation of spot ES_RQEEAL10.

So, I've coded something like below.

ENHANCEMENT 1  YPP_REMOVE_AFS_BUTTONS.    "active version

   INITIALIZATION.

   LOOP AT SCREEN.

     IF SCREEN-group4 EQ '098'

     OR SCREEN-group4 EQ '097'.

       SCREEN-invisible = 1.

       SCREEN-active = 0.

       MODIFY SCREEN.

     ENDIF.

   ENDLOOP.

ENDENHANCEMENT.

This is working fine to me.

It's important to say that QA32 and QA33 use the same report.

I've heard there's also another way, using SHD0 creating a new variant.

Regards.