on 09-24-2013 10:54 AM
Dear Authorized,
I have a situation but I don't know how I solve this problem.
Our company had an EHP Upgrade. Normally, we used 107 and 109 movement types for the import trade (Import PO).
Before the upgrade, the batch number wasn't created for 107 mov. type; it was created (still is) just for 109 mov. type.
But now, the batch number is created both of 107 and 109 mov. types. Moreover, the batch number (created for 107) is saved on the MBST table.
Here are the situations:
1. We have the 107 material documents that has not any batch number(they were created before the upgrade). When we want to do goods movement based on the purchase order number, the system gives an error like "MSTB-CWESB exceeded by 2.470 KG : 110111 1200 A001 0000192900"
2. If we do goods movement with 107 mov. type, the system gives just one batch number. Then, we do goods movement with a 109 mov. type, sometimes we need to take into the stocks with more than one batch numbers. But the current system does not allow this.
Because of the urgency of the goods movements, "MSTB-CWESB exceeded by 2.470 KG : 110111 1200 A001 0000192900" (error message no: M7022) red error was turned into the yellow warning. And the goods movements are doing without any trouble now.
But I want to learn: now, there is not any control for MSTB table; and tha data on MSTB table are getting oversized.
Is this problem for the system process? How can I provide not to create a batch number on 107 mov. type? (we argue this question but in the hard code it is must to create the batch number on 107 and 167 mov. type)
Thank you,
Beste
It is the new design that requires a batch for 107 movement, SAP explaines it in KBA 1748026 - Batch Created with Movement Type 107
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Mr. Jürgen, thank you for your help.
Note 1110140 - Valuated goods receipt blocked stock: Restrictions (FAQ) -> I think this note can help us?
Also, I have another question. As I said above, there was an red error (number M7022) but we changed it to the warning. Will it be a problem for us? Do you know anything about that?
Sincerely,
Beste
Yes, the Note 1110140 is actually the subject of the KBA mentioned by me.
M7022 is a very flexible message with a lot variables (& um & & überschritten &) . Just 2 words and 4 variables.
Without knowing the exact content of the message nobody can answer your question seriously.
KBA 1702040 - Different behaviour during Goods Receipt for Intercompany Stock Transport Order and Intra ... mentions this message, but unfortunately this KBA does not explain how this message is used under the new design
check in the path whether for mvmt 107 batch mgmt has been activated
Logistics general-Batch mgmt-Creation of new batches-Define batch creation for Goods mvmt.
Read documents before turning of Batches
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.