Ecess ( JEC1) and SHEcess( JSEP) not added to Cenvat clearing a/c in MIRO

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus,

All the settings, are correct,  JEX1, and JHX1 along with the JEC1 , JSEP also maintained in classification.

In MIGO postings are correct Cenvat clearing Cr. ( for sum of ED, Ecess, SHEcess), and ED -Dr. Ecess-Dr, and SHEcess Dr)

But when I do MIRO Cenvat clearing account is added with only ED but not Ecess and SHEcess. I am using ECC 6, Component- SAP_APPL- 604.

Please help.

Thanks in Advance

Krishna

[Former Member]

Dear Krishna,

Have you assigned your Cenvat Clearing G/L against your Tax Code for Ecess & SHCess in OB40

Also Check whether you have assign the Transaction Key in THE Tax Procedure.

Regards

Anupam

[Former Member]

Anupam,

How if I use condition records?

[former_member182489]

Krishna,

Is GL account assigned for it ?

Condition records are for auto pulling the data . To post the entry we need a GL

[former_member192897]

Are you facing this problem for the first time for the tax code used? You should provide some screen shots of your MIGO excise item tab as well PO taxes tab for better understanding.

[Former Member]

Hi Ashok,

Please find the document with the screen shots of Excise defaults settings, classification, PO , GR excise invoice and MIRO simulation.

Please advise

Krishna

[former_member192897]

Your configuration settings seems to be perfect. But, you did not answer my question. Are you facing the problem for the first time in MIRO or for the tax code used?

You may need to take the help of programmer and debug MIRO for the following function module and you may surely get some clue.

J_1I4_GET_ACTUAL_DUTY_IN_LIV   Get excise value at Invoice verification

[Former Member]

Dear Krishna,

In your MIGO document Tax code used is V0 while for MIRO its V1. Also in PO preview, the total tax is showing 1200.  Show kindly first check whether the Tax procedure is correct as in PO total tax should be shown as 1236.

Also check for Tax code V1 have You assigned values 2% for Ecess & 1% for SHECess & whether G/L account CENVAT CLEARING has been assigned to them

Regards

Anupam

[Former Member]

Ashok,

I was testing for first time after configuration. Now I could trace cause of the the problem, Actually I was getting the error while creating condition records , system was not allowing me to assign the condition values for JMX1,JEX1, JHX1, JEC1, JSEP, then when I searched I got the note 184985, as per this note I changed the tax condition class in condition type from D ( taxes ) to A ( Discount and surcharge, I changed back to D then the values are flowing correct. I need to check if fv11 is OK or the same problem while creating condition records.

[former_member192897]

What was the condition class for the condition types previously? You said you have changed the Condition class from D to A and then revert the changes. It should not be the exact problem. Excise values are flowing correctly in PO as well MIGO..

Any how you can check once again whether you have maintained the condition records properly in FV11. Run one complete cycle till MIRO and let us know your observations.

The Condtion class for the Tax condition type would be "D" Taxes only unless you change it manually.

[former_member182489]

Can you ensure setoff and % condition records - both maintained

Assignment Tax code to country is made in setting ?

Thanks

Manoj

[former_member182489]

• Is it for a new material and working fine for other Mat ?

           IF so check J1id settings

• Check if both condition % and Condition set off is maintained properly     
• Check - Condition set off and Condition % is maintained for the two condition Type you have mentioned

           If Not - Maintain SPRO-LG-Taxon Goods Mvt- Determination of Excise Duty-Condition Based Exc Deter-Classify Condition type)

Plz let me know

[Former Member]

Hi,

Please check in J_1IGRXREF table if the field values of EXNUM, EXDAT,
EXYEAR, STATUS, QTY and Excise values match with J_1IEXCDTL table.
Especially check for EXYEAR.

During MIRO excise values will flow from J_1IGRXREF table.

Regards,

Rajasree R

[Former Member]

Hi Rajasree,

Thank you for the quick response, as you said i compared the two tables J_1IGRXREF and J_1IEXCDTL, The values are perfectly matching for EXNUM, EXDAT, EXYEAR, STATUS, QTY.

What could be the reason....

Thanks in advance

[Former Member]

Hi,

Whether tax is getting calculated correctly in MIRO ?

Whether you have maintained the relevant GL in OB40 for your BED and ECess/SHEcess accounting keys in your tax procedure.

You can provide a screenshot for better understanding.

Thank you,