on 09-17-2013 9:26 PM
Hi,
Can someone explain me the difference between standard and enhanced propagation.
also under which conditions the standard and enhanced propagation does not work.
Thirdly is there any way we can understand that propagation has worked or why it has not worked
Propagation Mode for Execution Information
Controls how execution information is propagated between different related
freight documents.
The following options are available:
If you have not selected the checkbox Propagate
Execution Info in the Customizing activities for defining freight order
types, freight booking types, and transportation unit types, this setting is not
taken into account regarding the propagation of execution events to predecessor
documents. We recommend that you set the propagation mode to the same value for
all freight documents that are related to each other regarding the execution
tracking.
One freight unit with several containers is assigned to an ocean freight
booking. The behaviour regarding the propagation mode can be the following:
Standard Propagation
Enhanced Propagation
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Marco,
Firstly I Thank you for explaining this in such a great detail.
I have a question in mind, though exactly not similar to this scenario you have explained. This infact is related to the propagation from a successor document to the predecessor document.
I have a scenario where there are two freight units in a freight order going to the same location. In the case of a multi-pick scenario where the load (FU) is picked up from two different plants/ Shipping locations but going to the same customer location as a consolidated load. in this case when tracking is done at the shipment level, for example, a POD is reported at the customer location for the shipment (FOR) then the propagation will lead to updating both the Freight units with the same date/time stamp even if customer rejects one of the Freight units.
So is there a way to handle this case in EM?
Best Regards,
Pramod
User | Count |
---|---|
9 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.