Error in ASKb posting for Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects

[Former Member]

Using WBS element i trying to execute CJ88 then run ASKBN for the asset, which should actually pick Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects GL from account assignment.

But the entry us getting posted to Acquisition:Acquis. and production cost which is incorrect.

Please advice , very very urgent request experts please solve

[ab_ab · Accepted solution]

Gita,

Your question is not very clear. When you run KO88/CO88 the system would settle the cost to AuC. At this time system makes a ledger independent posting, which means that this posting would be made in both leading and all NLL assigned to the company code. This is standard SAP, and can not be changed. As your costs are moving from the cost object to the AuC, system would post the Debit to the AuC and credit to the expense account.

Regarding, ASKBN, unless you have a difference of APC in the leading and non leading areas, you don't even need to run ASKBN in this case.

Can you please state the accounting entry you expect, and what you actually see?

Also, do you have a requirement where only part of the cost is capitalized in one of the area? For ex: some costs which are capitalized in leading area are not capitalized in parallel area?

Thanks

Asheesh Bhatia

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks experts , issue resolved.

This issue is happening when internal consumption of material for AUC WBS element. During the analysis it is noticed that the capitalization Key 01 is not masked for Origin, which is resulting these internal consumption postings for the capitalization key.

In order to fix this issue, we will do Origin masking for Cap Key 01 with capitalization version 6.

[former_member182098]

Hi Gita,

Usually, you do not have control on the entry, which is standard, when you run ASKBN, system picks up the accounts from your account determination. This is standard process and you cannot manipulate the entry.

Can you please explain what entry SAP is posting? Why do you think that entry is incorrect and your expected journal entry is correct?

Kind Regards,

Ravi