cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

in which case there is value populated in EKKO-ZBDIT and no value in EKKO- ZTERM for UB purchse order

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

I have two UB documnet type purchase order.

1)  Plant 1 ( supply plant)  -> Plant 2 ( Recieving plant)

there is vendor master  to assign to plant 1 , payment term is  ZX11 in the vendor master  , payment day is 90

2)  Plant 3 ( supply plant) --> PLant 2 ( Recieving plant)

there is vendor master  to assign to plant 3 , payment term is  ZX12 in the vendor master  , payment day is 30

when i created UB documnet type purchase order, for  point 1 , there is value  '90'  in EKKO-ZBDIT,

but for point 2, there is no value in EKKO-ZBDIT.

Actually for UB doucment type PO , we don't want to have vuale in EKKO-ZBDIT.  but i don't know why for point 1 , why system populate value '90' in EKKO-ZBDIT . Could you please let me know the reason ? thanks!

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

tomas_talpa
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Violet,

so how are these Payment Terms ZX11&ZX12 actually customized? Please see SPRO: Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Vendor Master -> Define Terms of Payment. I would guess that even if there is description like "Due 30 days" for ZX12, the actual number of days (ZTAG1) is not maintained.

As for "we don't want to have vuale in EKKO-ZBD1T" -- well, once you have it in customizing for Payment Terms (T052-ZTAG1/ZTAG2/ZTAG3), then it will be copied into PO (EKKO-ZBD1T/ZBD2T/ZBD3T), that's the whole point of having Payment Terms predefined here. If you don't want to have any Payment Terms for given Vendor, that Vendor Master should be maintained accordingly.

Kind Regards

TomT

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Tomas,

I checked in table T052.  T052-ZTAG1 is 90 for ZX11, T052-ZTAG1 is 30 for ZX12.

from my understanding , for UB PO, EKKO-ZBD1T should not get value from vendor master payment term configuration.

but i am not sure why in my system for some case , it was get populated.

Former Member
0 Kudos

This message was moderated.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Anyway thanks Tomas for you looking at this issue!

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

I have found the root cause,  when user use ME21N ,the PO firstly default type is NB.

User drag the PR to basketball during ME21N .  Later use the change the PO type to UB .

so it will cause this issue .

when user go to me21n , the first thing to change the PO type to UB , then drag the PR to basket ball , it will be ok .

it is SAP bug , it is didn't clear the EKKO-ZBD1T when user  change the PO type from NB to UB .

in our system since we will configue default document for STO for this two plants, it will avoid such issue.

tomas_talpa
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Thanks for update, Violet; it's appreciated that you post your own issue resolution&solution.

Have a nice day

TomT