Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PFAC vs OOCU_RESP

Go to solution
Former Member

‎07-28-2013 1:43 PM

0 Kudos

Hi all,

What is the better way to maintain a rule in locked client (in a security measurement) ?

Is it better to create a transport in DEV (PFAC) or to make a change directly in PRD (OOCU_RESP)

Thanks,

Julia.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Go to solution
Former Member

‎07-28-2013 10:10 PM

0 Kudos

Hi,

It's been a while since I've done this but it makes sense to follow the policy of using PFAC to change the rule (and transporting) and then OOCU_RESP for just the assignments. 

3 REPLIES 3

Go to solution
Former Member

‎07-28-2013 10:10 PM

0 Kudos

Hi,

It's been a while since I've done this but it makes sense to follow the policy of using PFAC to change the rule (and transporting) and then OOCU_RESP for just the assignments. 

Go to solution
Former Member
In response to Former Member

‎07-29-2013 7:21 AM

0 Kudos

Thank you for your answer - it is make sence!

Is there any document (in sap help or maybe a note) that can refer to this sap policy? 

Go to solution
Former Member
In response to Former Member

‎07-29-2013 10:12 AM

0 Kudos

Hi Julia,

I've not seen anything specific.  I have used the view that a similar process to standard HR should be followed -  the rules are treated like config (structural authorisations in the HR context) and all config should be transported.  Assignments are treated more like master data.

Cheers