"What to Consider Before Partnering With a Spouse in Business" - and it isn't even in the tag that must not be named...
23 Comments
-
Jul 25, 2017 at 03:30 PM
Not sure I follow about the tags. Which tag must not be named?
-
Jul 25, 2017 at 03:33 PM
The tag that must not be named? I mean Business Tr... oh, wait, stop, that was close. You nearly got me there :-)
-
Jul 26, 2017 at 11:43 AM
That's a scary one for sure...
-
-
-
Jul 25, 2017 at 03:32 PM
To borrow from "how to twerk": "Step 1. Reconsider"
Have to give it to the author though - somehow in the last sentence they managed to mention SAP. :)
Update: did "the needful". OP is not a trapezoid, quite surprisingly. Looks like a recently created account for some kind of "business consultant" spamming SCN with similar blogs. Can't understand why though. It's not like anyone is reading the SCN blogs. I guess the temptation of adding "SCN blog author" to the Linkedin profile was too big...
-
Jul 26, 2017 at 09:35 AM
<falls off chair thinking about Jelena twerking....>
-
Jul 26, 2017 at 04:31 PM
I don't! Because I RTFM. :)
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 11:40 AM
at least one other person uses that abbreviation. I'm happy, i'm not alone. Wait, we're not supposed to tell this to customers, aren't we ?
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 11:56 AM
Admitting in public the usage of abbreviated Read This Fantabulous Manual is covered by NDA?
Who would have thought...
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 12:14 PM
first rule of support club .....
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jul 25, 2017 at 04:40 PM
Page is no longer available
-
Jul 26, 2017 at 09:56 AM
someone screenshotted it?
Now I don't know what the fuss was about.
-
Jul 26, 2017 at 04:30 PM
Google still has cached version if you type in the title. Really groundbreaking stuff. "Buy low, sell high." Just to give you a taste:
Top notch analytical work here. "50 percent" link leads... no, not to the US census stats but to some psychology association page that says "40-50 %" and is not supported by any factual evidence.
-
Jul 28, 2017 at 09:02 PM
The blog post was taken down as part of a divorce settlement. Apologies for any inconvenience.
-
Jul 31, 2017 at 01:07 PM
This would have fitted nicely into the tag that must not be named, though. ^^
.
Steve, how did you find this? Did you search for a billing and revenue software that can help you with your spouse-co-owned business? :D
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 08:22 AM
I do still follow the "all blogs" RSS feed. Given the state of the activity stream at the moment, this is the best way for me to keep finding new stuff. Some of it of questionable quality, obviously...
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 08:32 AM
Yeah, but gems like this are fun for us. ^^
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 09:09 AM
Questionable quality, but definite entertainment value. :-)
-
Aug 01, 2017 at 09:13 AM
And no shortage of fresh examples :)
-
-
-
-
-
Aug 03, 2017 at 01:50 PM
These must be the same folks who are writing the articles on Forbes: "SAPVoice"? I read one posted the other day about personal development planning in the latter stages of your career. It was mostly horrible and filled with so many simple grammatical errors, making it hard to read, regardless of content.
-
Aug 03, 2017 at 04:14 PM
Hi, Scott:
Would you happen to have the link?
Best regards,
--Jerry
-
Aug 04, 2017 at 07:05 PM
Not finding the exact article at the moment. Maybe they pulled it back for editing.
They seem to have a landing page for all these articles though. There are others by IBM, Adobe, etc.
-
-
Aug 04, 2017 at 08:42 PM
Looks like the crowd from the SCN space we don't speak of. Would be nice of them to move to Forbes permanently. Seems like a much more suitable place for that kind of content TBH.
-
