Skip to Content

Tag Browser versus Browse the Community?

As many of you probably already know the Browse the Community function was recently updated. Since many of us have been agitating for a Tag Browser since before go-live and we have had the experience of using Helmut Tammen's SAPUI5 based browser, what do you think of what the SAP Community provided instead? Please note that the spreadsheet the Tag Browser is based on is about 5 months out of date, but that was an inherent limitation of what was provided at the time.

Tag Browser

vs

Browse the Community

Thanks, Mike (Moderator)

SAP Technology RIG

LATE BREAKING NEWS: The Tag Browser is now OFFICIALLY part of the Community.

Click on Community then Blogs (or Questions & Answers) then About Blogging.

Scroll down until you see Managed Tags and User Tags and it is just under there (with a nice call out to Helmut Tammen. Have not seen it in the Release Notes just yet. Updated for June and next month it should likely be automatically fed by the Semaphore Workbench API. Kudos to Helmut, Brian Bernard, and Oliver Kohl for all their contributions to making this a reality!!!

2
Show 73
* Please Login or Register to Comment on or Follow discussions.
avatar image
Apr 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM edited Jul 11, 2017 at 11:09 AM
4.4k

Is this a rhetorical question?

The app is faster, easier to use, there is a search option, you have direct blogs and answers links, which load faster than the general tag or topic pages - what is not to like? Yes, the data in it is slightly outdated, but I would rather use my local xls from 07.04 than play point-and-click/hidden object games in Browse the Community.

3 Share

Hi Veselina,

It was not meant to be a rhetorical question, though those who are familiar with my opinions might think so. I am trying to get a feel for what others think about what was provided instead of what was asked for repeatedly. Perhaps my (pretty low) opinion of the Browse the Community functionality does not represent that of a majority of our members. Or majority of active members who gather in the Coffee Corner.

So I truly desire your feedback and opinions.

Cheers, Mike (Moderator)

SAP Technology RIG

0 Share

It was meant as a joke... obiously, didn't work.

I use Helmut's app mainly in Virtualbox, for my host OS I prefer the excel file.

The reason is, that my guest OS is running at the minimum RAM requirements and every MB counts.

Initially, I tried to use Steffi's approach from there (view source), but the page load time is bad, a few times my main browser crashed, when I attempted to view the page source. While I was typing my response to you, I opened also Firefox and did the same exercise... On the bright side, now I know when to use xfdesktop --reload. :)

There is another functionality, which works almost as a tag browser... without the browsing part: the tag picker. Yes, you need to type 3 characters to trigger it, but, if you use a common character sequence, for example 'SAP', it lists the results in a structured way. I enter the tags in my draft blog and use preview: I only need the sm_tech_ids to find the answers link (I type it directly in the url bar, I even have templates for this).

By reading about the workarounds not to use the overview page as it was originally intended, you can probably guess my sentiment.

There is still a chance for future improvements, but, what worries me the most, is the mentality 'we know, it is not good enough, but it is a temporary solution'. We got the original 'Browse the Community', because there was barely anyhing resembling navigation; we got the excel file, because almsot everybody was lost and members started creating dummy content just to navigate and follow tags; we got another excel file for tags mapping to spaces, because people were still lost which tag to use; then Helmut created the app, because for him and many others this is better than using two Excel files to navigate within a web site (at least until a proper tag browser is delivered here); now we get another overview page, which will be probably replaced with something else soon (if the roadmap in the wiki is accurate). When do we start looking into a well-designed, permanent solution? Seven months since the site launch, if you count also Open Beta - almost a year.

3 Share

Sorry, I took it as an ironic comment rather than a joke. Will try to keep a more open mind and attitude in the future.

I definitely agree that there is a mindset problem. Especially when you look at who they involve in making these changes. Not a member rep to be seen. All the people who brought us to this state still have no idea what they are doing wrong.

Cheers, Mike

1 Share

The issue with the new "Browse the Community" page is IMO that it's not clear that "Popular" means "here are all the topic pages for stuff we thought deserved a startpage of its own" and "All content" shows all available tags.

The smallprint for "Popular" says

These pages bring together content on popular community topics.

And the one for "All content"

These pages bring together content on individual tags.

Still it's confusing.

Mix that with the non-search and strange sorting structure (IDM under "Technology Platform"?!) and you have a page with a lot of info that you can't really use.

But it's still better than what was there before with the old browser, because now at least you can see all available tags.

0 Share

Are you able to find SAP Select tag in Browse the Community?

<spoiler>

This is an event

</spoiler>

2 Share

Nope. Looking at the source code of the page (that's how I found my IDM the last time) shows it's not there.

Very selective with those tags, are they? ^^ Or maybe that's one of those that get kicked?

0 Share

Hi Veselina,

The only content piece that exists under SAP Select was created today. The Browse the Community All Content page only displays tags with content and is not currently updated on a daily frequency. We felt this was an acceptable compromise for the first iteration, as we do not expect a large volume of tags will have their very first content created each day. SAP Select will appear in the next refresh of the page.

Best,

Jamie

0 Share

It will not as I constantly delete its content as not a single question posted under this tag had ever anything to do with the event. Just deleted the tag 4 times today. People think this tag is used to ask question about the select statement in ABAP. It is time to explain the tags.

6 Share

Thanks for the additional info, Jürgen.

0 Share
It is time to explain the tags.

So true.

2 Share

One of the main points of disagreement I have is that one does not see even a significant percentage of the tags available. Perfect example. Under Technology Platform, I can find SAP Fiori. If I were interested in viewing all the subordinate tags, I should be able to click on it and see a list or perhaps a bunch of buttons with each tag labeled on it (55 buttons). Semaphore is not much better for navigation, but it does have a hierarchy built in and search functionality (though poorly structured).

If I were mostly using Browse the Community to find CTPs, we were better off with the previous version which had a useful Search function. So this is very disappointing to me on several levels.

  1. Does not display all the tags or even a significant percentage. When you go to see All Content, if your tag is not visible and you are not familiar enough to know it is under Fiori, or NetWeaver, or CRM, you have to expand (another set of More buttons?) to see all the tags.
  2. Does not navigate to a Tag page, only to a CTP in Popular Content. Why not to the Tag page like in All Content?
  3. No search function, except that provided by the browser.
  4. Label for Popular Content should be Community Topic Pages (since those are where you end up). Label for All Content should be All Tag Pages (again, since that is the end point).

Once again, I will make the point that Helmut provided a really nice tool which was built using our own SAPUI5 technology which could have been implemented more than 5 months ago (almost 6 now) that performed the desired tasks. It could also have been easily modified with an additional column for the CTP navigation. But no, we had to wait over 6 months for something which is substantially less useful as well as more cumbersome.

Regards, Mike

0 Share

And don't forget:

The Browse the Community All Content page only displays tags with content

as explained by Jamie in this thread. So that ties in with your first bullet point.

Using the browser search in Chrome didn't show me "my" Identity Management. I had to search in the source code of the page, as the "More" buttons don't work so well with my Chrome browser.

And I would have never found the IDM using logic, as it is placed under "Technology Platform". No idea who had that idea... maybe because once there was a "Netweaver" in its name?

IMO it would really help (and should go pretty fast) to at least implement your forth point. Just put a better explanation on the page what to find where.

1 Share

Oh but with our limited resources and the paperwork to make such a change, make the difficulty insurmountable! [or insert your own favorite whine/excuse here]

In theory it would be a pretty easy change. Helmut's tag browser was done in less than two days. Why can't we do such fine work addressing real needs in a similar amount of time? Seriously, what prevents us from doing so?

0 Share

Bitter Mike is bitter... ;)

1 Share

Hi Steffi,

Not so much bitter as frustrated. Trying to remain positive is more challenging every day. At some point, the way SAP Community is managed has to change. I just hope we still have some of our members by the time.

But thanks for the face slap. Attitude is adjusted, at least for a little while.

Cheers, Mike

0 Share
Show more comments

Full disclosure: I've not been using Helmut's app and am not really using Browse Community. Previously, we had Site Index linked directly on the home page that opened a simple list of links to the available spaces in alphabetic order. For my usual spaces I had bookmarks in the browser and only visited Site Index when I was looking to post in some new (to me) space or if someone posted in a wrong space and I was just checking if a more suitable space exist.

For these purposes, I'm using the spreadsheet which I can open instantly and then use Excel's Search capability (in Site Index, I just used Ctrl-F in browser).

Right now I don't feel any need or desire to go to Browse Community. Why? Well, this is because what I see when I get there:

In Excel, I see only helpful information. Here, I see 5 things that are wrong with SCN.
1. Look at all the white space!
2. More scrolling and clicking: first page does not provide any information immediately (well, the whole page is taken by # 1 ).
3. Navigation: 'Topics >' - when I see this on PC I expect some menu to appear (because that's what '>' is usually for). But turns out it's just a hyperlink and what it does it actually scrolls my screen down to where I don't see Topics header anymore. Hey, where are the topics? Ah, those are the topics, on top, without any header:

4. And what is the deal with these Topics? Why 3 things for ABAP? Those all should've been just rolled up into "ABAP Development". Is Connectivity or Testing not part of development? It is! And where is HANA or S/4HANA or Analytics? Are they not topics?

5. Products, etc. SAP stubbornly tries to organize SCN in the way they perceive their product line-up. I guess this makes perfect sense for the marketing department to match SCN to some SKU's in CRM. But this does not work for the customers IMHO because their vision of SAP "products" is different. E.g. SAP keeps saying HANA is "platform" (and it's placed under "platforms") but the customers already filed it under "database". And we still use "Basis", so good luck trying to convince us HANA is not DB. :)

image2.jpg (59.9 kB)
32135-image1.jpg (127.2 kB)
3 Share

(Ran out of the picture quota in the previous post, so continuing here.)

This is how "popular topics" are presented on a modern website (built using Answer Hub too, by the way):

Do you see much white space? No. Topics are presented as buttons, so it's very clear what will happen when we click on them. "View all" is right there on the same screen.

I feel like SCN is suffering from some kind of identity crisis and the efforts to appeal to both mobile and desktop users somehow end up with a combination of the worst features of both worlds. Huge screens that look cute on a phone but horrendous on desktop - check. Navigation from the 90s websites - check.

Not sure if we are sending mixed messages to the SCN team or they're just stuck with the platforms that don't want to "breed" with each other and/or lousy developers.

image.jpg (19.4 kB)
3 Share

I can't imagine the "Browse the Community" page looking good on a smartphone display. And I'm too afraid to check.

0 Share

A bit less white space:

image.jpg (48.5 kB)
0 Share

And how do the lists of topic spaces and tags look?

0 Share

Too lazy to get a screenshot but it's just a plain list, like on the website, except on the cell phone it's all in one column, not two.

0 Share

Hi Jelena,

I have no objection to any of your criticisms above, as they are the same ones I've made. However, I had to make a judgement call as to whether they were enough to continue to allow only the CTPs list as the "Browse Community" option, or to roll this out with the promise to resolve items like the white space (it's ugly, I know) in the next iteration. As you know, we are also working on re-designing the way we utilize the tags and the overall experience. Unfortunately, we're not quite where we want to be yet, but based on your comments, we're moving in the right direction.

Best,

Jamie

0 Share

What is "CTP"?

0 Share

Community Topic Pages.

You know, the slow ones, which one uses to find/bookmark the answers links and get the blog feed URLs :)

4 Share

Hi Jamie,

Can we at least get the labels changed as I suggested? The current ones are misleading and confusing.

Thanks, Mike

0 Share

Thanks Mike. While I feel the All Content tab is named according to exactly what users are going to get on that page: tags with content, I'll admit we had several discussions around proper wording for the Popular tab. We settled on "Popular" because that's what CTPs are based on -- high activity levels, among other things.

0 Share

Could you maybe add somewhere the hint "tags with content"? When I read that, I thought that were all available tags, until someone corrected me.

0 Share

Thanks for the idea, Steffi. I'll mull over with Brian Bernard what the language says below the tab and see if we can add some language that clarifies the intent on this page:

0 Share
Show more comments

I think Steffi nailed it with: "But it's still better than what was there before with the old browser, because now at least you can see all available tags." Gali cited tag improvements when she published the update about the road map:

https://blogs.sap.com/2017/04/11/mapping-the-journey-ahead/. Jamie did the same with her closing comments in

https://blogs.sap.com/2017/04/13/re-paving-the-roads-an-sap-community-navigation-update/.

I'm not trying to suggest that all the issues outlined here will be solved within the next couple months. I'm just trying to recognize that Steffi's statement matches the overall philosophy: improvements in iterations.

As for Helmut's tag browser...I'm a fan. That's why he was (quite deservedly) named Member of the Month for December:

https://blogs.sap.com/2016/12/14/helmut-tammen-member-of-the-month-december-2016/. But as noted, the drawback is that the app is based on an older list.

1 Share

We need consistency - when it takes months to remove tags then it should also take months to get new tags added.

1 Share

Hey Jerry, I think your last link was intended to be: https://blogs.sap.com/2016/12/14/helmut-tammen-member-of-the-month-december-2016/

(Got it quite quickly via Overview-Page -> View the Member Hall of Fame)

0 Share

Well I certainly hope that you can find the Member of the Month Hall of Fame easily enough, Joachim. I'd hate to think that we've made it difficult for the actual Members of the Month to access! :)

Anyway, you're absolutely right, and I corrected. Thanks for bringing to my attention.

1 Share

I can't say much about the Tag browser as I used it only 3 times, from the surface it is certainly state-of-the-art, of course it does not fit in the 1DX scheme as this would need to total overhaul to get there.

Nevertheless, the Browse the Community is a step into the right direction as it gives a kind of a site map with was missing before.

Making it dynamic based on content

- makes it certainly "self-maintaining"

- and fits with the page name "Browse the community" as this browsing makes only sense if it has content.

I am a bit torn about this "Popular" and "All Content"

The "Popular" page has probably all the tags that are finally needed

The "All content" unfortunately does not show all content right away, it has again these stupid more buttons, while in the background the system had already read and retrieved all content, so why not showing all content?

I just tested it Ctrl+F using the search term "SAP ERP" (which is not in the directly shown tags - probably not so an important product for SAP), my browser tells me that it has found 65 hits, but it needed 13 clicks to get the first visible tag with SAP ERP in the name. Very disappointing behavior!

And the page is slow, it takes at least twice of time that I have patience for, but at least it saves me the time to open this Excel sheet as this takes a bit longer for me since I have not installed Excel on all systems that I use to access the Community.

Personally I wished I could follow those tags directly from either one of the pages in Browse the Community without the need to do another click into a damn slow page.

0 Share
The "Popular" page has probably all the tags that are finally needed

I might be wrong, but "Popular" and "All Content" does not show the same content type. My clicking around says, you see all the available "Community Topic Pages" (formally known as Space Homepages) and under "All Content" you get all the tag pages. So two different things in my book.

0 Share

Hi Steffi,

The previous Browse the Community was much more useful in finding Community Topic Pages than the Popular implementation. Perhaps they could revert it back?

Cheers, Mike

0 Share

I don't think going back would be the best way. Going forward fast would be much better. The new "Browse whatever" is a better base for what we all want (because you have topic pages and tags), but it needs a lot of work still.

2 Share

"Goodbye Spaces..." this opening portion of a blog title (no offense intended Brian) still sums up much of the community challenges IMHO. The Hello Tags aspect is going to be a long term WIP. No matter how we organize or reorient ways to find the content, when we personalize it and make it part of our 'followed' profile, when we are forced to use single tags at a time, and in single sites at a time we end up with a fragmented view. To me this is one of the major blows to the sense of 'community' and being able to easily gather around focus areas or areas of interest.

1 Share

Long, long, really, really long term WIP! Like maybe by 2020 it will actually work reasonably well, like say it is getting close to what we had with Jive? The Open Beta Recap items don't seem to have gotten any consideration, most Idea Place suggestions are being ignored, but a detailed analysis is being done to determine what needs to be fixed. Still waiting....

1 Share

2020, don't we get a new platform then, you're killing my hope!? Usually the cycles become shorter every time, in 2012 Jive was launched, in 2016 this community ....

0 Share

On the other hand, Microsoft issued 'the last Windows version ever', a version, which is never finished. This looks similar, except that MS have a huge population of developers and beta-testers, different branches and the option to defer updates.

1 Share

Probably right. But going on the list of known bugs reported in Open Beta and seeing how many haven't been addressed (or even completely ignored as requirements for fixes) and apparently aren't going to be addressed any time soon, I suspect that date might even be optomistic. Wonder if Oliver Kohl or Gali Kling-Schneider have checked it out recently. It does not look like it is providing any direction for their priorities.

0 Share

It's intriguing that this topic is causing such a heated discussion. I've never used (since 2010) any "integrated" search possibilities, neither in SDN, nor SCN(Jive) nor the current nameless abomination. Instead I've been using google with google operators with which I usually find everything there is to find, narrowed down and specified in a max. of 5 minutes (changing my search approach probably 20 times in that time window). I never undertood why there's even a need for anything besides that.

" site: scn.sap.com | answers.sap.com | blogs.sap.com"

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

*bracing for sh*tstorm*

3 Share

LOL Lukas!

I routinely suggest that folks use the two custom Google searches, one of which was created after the SDN-->SCN migration took place with a defective search functionality and the second created more recently, also as a stand in for our current search tool.

https://cse.google.com/cse/home?cx=013447253335410278659:5di2969x5we
https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=013447253335410278659:k8ob9ipscwg

I don't use the operators, just tweak the search parameters a bit (which I guess is by default using the operators). I usually get in the ball park of what I am looking for.

0 Share

One reason for using the internal search: https://answers.sap.com/articles/173927/status-update-community-links-are-not-appearing-in.html

I don't use the standard Google search engine, so I cannot tell if the situation has improved in the meantime.

The internal search takes some time to get used to, but it is not that bad. Sadly, it lacks a few features, which would make it easier to use and more efficient.

0 Share

Does this thread run off the page to the right for anyone else? I can't see the posting timestamps unless I widen the window to fit across multiple monitors. Only seems to happen with IE for me as opposed to Chrome though.

1 Share

Yep. I've used zoom to find the timestamps. ^^

1 Share

I noticed a similar issue yesterday - not sure what site/thread it was, but I had negative whitespace and was even seeing text within the vertical scroll bar. It didn't matter how wide my screen was it was spilling over both the left and right edges.

0 Share

Could be Jelena's big screenshot for this thread. Some auto-resize would be cool. ^^

1 Share

you are right

0 Share

BTW: I hadn't really noticed this before in the coffee corner.. sorry..

But at least in the tags I can put in "QM" and find the PLM Quality Management (QM) tagged items.

I dare you to find PLM Quality Management in the browser. I haven't been able to hunt and peck my way around enough to find it yet.

Craig

0 Share

Dare accepted! Here it is:

Steps to find it:

Option 1:

1. First you have to use the search function with criteria quality. This will result in expanding the list https://www.sap.com/community/topic.all-content.html. If you do not expand the list and try using the built-in browser search you will not be able to display the items.

2. In Firefox the built-in search is triggered by CTRL+F. I use highlight all press enter until I reach the desired entry. Do not use the search solution, designed by the implementation team for this step, it stops at the first entry, making the text bold.

Option 2:

1. Display page source (in Firefox this is CTRL+U).

2. Use in-page search (CTRL+F) and look for quality. After a lot of clicking you end up here:

3. Now the real fun part: click on the link and you will get to another page, where in the URL bar you will see:

view-source:https://www.sap.com/community/tag.html?id=484135010855456218597016630642366

4. Copy the part without view-source: and you will have the URL.

I dare you to do these with a mobile phone (and no cheating by connecting it to a laptop).

plm-qaulity.jpg (85.7 kB)
quality-source.jpg (193.6 kB)
0 Share

Awesome...

Now how would the new person to the site know how to do that??

First, option 2 isn't really an option. No user should EVER have to display source to use a web page!!

In Option 1, after doing step 1: The PLM QM area was the 15th of 15 instances of Quality after I did step 1.

Does it REALLY need to be this difficult!!!??????????????????????????? Honestly??

It would be great if all the users had the mad skills you do!

Craig

0 Share

I thought, that this was a Schnitzeljagd question, sorry about the confusion :)

Actually, if you do the same exercise with search term QM, it is a lot easier: in view source (option 2) you have just 1 result; if you type QM and press the search icon instead of Enter (option 1), it actually navigates to the place, where PLM Quality Management (QM) is, but it is not marked with bold or highlighted (so I would still use the browser search to highlight the text as additional step).

Why you have to press the search icon instead of Enter? Why the text is not marked with bold in this case? No idea... :)

The October launch made me dust off what I learned by playing not pr0n long time ago.

I agree, searching for content does not have to be difficult. This is the only 'real' site, where I resort to view source, developer tools etc.

Browse the community is an example how not to design a tag page.

And this is how other communities do that:

Why it has to be so hard? I don't know...

tag-search.jpg (76.6 kB)
2 Share

Kind of I guess. :-)

But it was more to point out that the new or average user has a very difficult time to figure out how to post to, or follow QM questions and blogs.

You are hardly new or average!

Craig

0 Share

Posting a question with QM tag does not require going through All Content page, although support for searching with 2 characters in https://answers.sap.com/questions/ask.html would be an improvement.

<rant>

I am still unconvinced, that the idea of using tags as the main way to structure content (topic pages and topic URLs like https://www.sap.com/community/topic/erp-sd/all-content.html are not useful due to design and speed), was well thought out. It is definitely possible for both to co-exist and complement each other, for example here:https://forum.manjaro.org/tags/pamac or https://forum.manjaro.org/c/technical-issues-and-assistance/aur.

I do not know from where the SAP designers get inspiration or ideas, but just browsing the web outside SAP domain can give much food for thought. It is disheartening, that a group of non-professional UX experts (I assume that they are not, but I could be wrong), did a better job at structuring content, not to mention the concept of watching, tracking and muting categories,tags and threads +RSS support in the chosen platform, which is ages ahead of what we have at present.

My recommendation to the SC designer(s): please, navigate outside out of SAP domain, register at a few sites, learn from other people's design successes or failures, read up on web standards, use the current forum for at least 2 hours/day outside your working time. It is apparent, that you cannot design well something, which you do not understand. Contrary to the popular belief, UX is not all about art, it has more to do with science and a lot more - with old plain common sense.

</rant>

2 Share

So your asking for a "Browse the page's source code" button...? :)

Your "rant" (which is not "ranting" at all in my book) is soooo true, and I still cannot understand how a huge software company like SAP can afford to make it so difficult for its community.

0 Share

Looks a bit like the Tag Browser that Helmut created long, long ago when navigation was first identified as a flaw in the SAP Community! :D

0 Share

Hmm. I just put "PLM Quality Management (QM)" into the search field for "All Content" and it jumped right to the tag.

.

I'm really surprised that worked. :D Working with IE11 here.

screenshot256.jpg (43.4 kB)
0 Share

It works in Firefox, too - if you know the exact tag description. The problem is, that normally you do not know that and search with a partial name. If it happens, that the search result is unique, it works as you described. If there are more results, it depends whether they are in the same screen or not.

1 Share

The average new user would NEVER know the exact tag!

Try the same thing with just "Quality Mangement" or "QM" or "Quality"

Craig

0 Share

"I dare you to find PLM Quality Management in the browser.".

I just followed you to the letter. ;)

0 Share

Yeah.. I should have said find Quality Management and not given you the actual tag!!! :-)

And it was "PLM Quality Management (QM)".

Craig

0 Share

"WOOP WOOP" for the update! Have just included Helmut's tag browser in my template for "this is the wrong tag, people!". :D

1 Share

I think Browse the Community is aesthetically better and its approach to group products by family is better than the raw list of tags (until the tags are fixed and not just tech names from sales spreadsheet)

1 Share

But Helmuts browser also groups the tags. oO

1 Share

not the same way, If I browse by product - I get simple list of ALL products.

1 Share

Hi Denis,

As much as you and I usually agree on things, I have been using Helmut's TB daily for months even with the out of date tag list. It is so much easier to use. Aesthetics mean nothing to me if the functionality is less. Same with the grouping (which is also available in the TB).

In the couple of times I tried to use the Browse the Community, it was slow and usually did not address my need in one pass. It worked even that well only because I am really, really familiar with the tag universe at this time.

Cheers, Mike

Tag Browser: https://detammenitsapcommunitytags-p001984trial.dispatcher.hanatrial.ondemand.com/index.html?hc_reset

@Steffi, It is now part of my new signature! :D

0 Share

Aesthetics are subjective thing. Within current design paradigm on this site, community browser looks the part. Not that I particularly like the IDX design philosophy, I hate it with passion as it is completely out of touch with actual users. But if we're adding parts - they need to look the same.

Functionality part I mostly agree. Tag browser gives you ALL tags and its easy to select those you need. But it does not gives you product families. (or I'm using it wrong)

For example, for Business Objects related products - the sheer number of entries is overwhelming. I've been supporting this family for 12 years and I'm not familiar with 98% of the names used.
Community browser shields me from this tag mess and gives me mostly correct list of main tags. SAP Simple ;) for once.

p.s.
I'm old school and try to avoid using search, I like to navigate to things by clicking on hierarchical trees....

2 Share

I am also old school and I'd rather use menus to navigate between forum sections.

Unfortunately, with the current design concept (3000+ tags, where the tag hierarchy is of questionable quality), this is impossible.

Here is what I believe, makes the most sense for functional folks: use the SPRO structure or the SAP Menu structure as a basis - both are well-known, rarely change much between versions and both are somewhat logical. Place the FIORI apps under a common FIORI apps node and use the structure from FIORI Apps Library. With a bit of effort one could come up with a meaningful structure for other sections after speaking with some SMEs. I still cannot understand why this has to be so complicated.

I could not find My Benefits in https://www.sap.com/community/topic.all-content.html, while it is present in Helmut's browser. Is the tag really missing in All Content? If yes - is the tag getting retired and which source of data we shall trust now?

To my surprise, I found SAP GRC Access Approver under Financial Management. Who would have thought? I had the impression, that this is an application for managers to grant you firefighter access or additional roles in PRD...

"I've been supporting this family for 12 years and I'm not familiar with 98% of the names used."

I feel relieved, I thought, that it was just me googling tag descriptions...

1 Share

I would understand if that 98% were the all sap products, but I meant the names that supposed to belong to my product area.

If only the tech people ruled the world ;)

1 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded